2006 subaru legacy gt review




2006 subaru legacy gt review

Article Navigation:
  • Photo
  • Long-Term Test Verdict: Subaru Legacy GT Limited - Motor Trend
  • Video
  • RELATED PAGES
  • View all consumer vehicle reviews for the Subaru Legacy on Subaru Legacy GT Limited 4dr Sedan AWD w/Black Int.

    The Subaru Legacy GT Limited offers more performance than most cars in its class, but this comes at the expense of cabin gadgetry.

    by writer: Kim Reynolds photographer: Editors of Motor Trend July 21, Our long-term Subaru Legacy GT, which we've finally handed back to Subaru of course, Fuji Heavy Industries's renowned AWD that variably distributes the.

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    I have driven Saabs for 20 years too,and this car feels more like a Saab should feel than current Saabs do. I am on my…1,2,3,4,5th Subaru and here are a couple of things I can say without hesitation: And cheap plastic abounded. Now they are not quite luxury and not quite frugal.

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    Subaru Legacy GT Limited review: Subaru Legacy GT Limited - Roadshow

    With redesigned headlights and taillights and a larger, chrome-ified grille opening, the LGT looks like an edgier, more aggressive Camry before Toyota beat it with an ugly stick. Even on Sport Sharp, the automatic is over a second slower to sixty from rest. During a trip through the mountains, only another LGT with local knowledge could show us a clean set of tailpipes. If the previous LGT stuck to the road like a sucker fish to a stone, the new model adds a dab of super glue. This website has said it many times: Or not, as the case may be.

    I forgive TTAC for using older photos, as the refresh is admittedly quite subtle. I'll make the switch ASAP. Thanks for your patience. Although the X is available only with auto transmission, somehow the LGT does not have the panache in the minds of the customer. The engines in earlier LGTs with the automatic lulled and surged south of 3, rpm. Well, maybe the engine did the same with the manual, but with the manual the engine spent very little time south of 3, rpm.

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    The stick left after , the wagon is gone altogether for For pricing, fuel economy, and reliability info on this car:. Reviews of the Aerio and Enclave have prompted concern over the long term viability of the Suzuki and Buick as surviving brands, and I think the same can be said of Subaru.

    They have many models, and few sales, meaning that their platforms fail to earn the economies of scale that players like Toyota, GM and Honda do. This economic hardship is not sustainable. The LGT gives me nearly all the performance that I can reasonably use in a much more attractive package.

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    Now I just have to shake the urge to mod it…. This is exactly why Subaru is a great company. I feel like one of the lucky ones. Most of those seemed to have been taken care of. Unfortunately some of them you put up with because regardless of warranty you get tired of taking the car in. My biggest complaint is the durability of some of the materials — exterior sheetmetal, paint, interior pieces and parts but my wife is brutal on some stuff with her nails.

    Outside of that the car is an absolute blast to drive and looks great. There is nothing quite like taking the onramp at crazy speeds and feeling the awd pull you through and stick like no rear-wheel or front-wheel drive car could EVER do. Unknown, bad chassis vibration at RPM. Rear wiper froze up. Weird, snap oversteer at a certain steering input, like you crossed a fulcrum. Aluminum wheels that leaked air. Dash lights burned out. Power window switches failed.

    Rear liftgate handle corrodes and become inoperative. No other reason, and they hardly had a controlling interest. They have the Legacy platform, which supplies the Legacy, Outback, and Tribeca, and the Impreza platform, which underpins the Impreza and all its variants and the Forester. They got rid of the Baja. Engines are largely shared between cars, and most of the differences between models amount to performance tweaking and cosmetic differences.

    2006 subaru legacy gt review

    There are only a handful of variations, and few custom options. Long term, how can Subaru stay competitive with a company that can spread its engineering costs over so much more volume? Mazda clearly took aim at Subaru for this vehicle segment and were more or less successful. However they were focusing more on developing new technology rather than record sales. These cars share plenty of similarities, but here are some of the differences I found between the two:.

    Performance-wise, they are about the same. The LGT has a few less ponies but also weighs a few pounds less. Each has structural reinforcements over the base model. Megan, we can go back and forth over the reason s GM dumped Subaru. At the end of the day, the investment turned out to be non-strategic because there were few synergies, given the unwillingness to share platforms. As far as Subaru not needing economies of scale, do me a favor, name a successful, profitable mainstream carmaker with as few sales as Subaru.

    🚗 2006 Subaru Legacy GT. What makes it a GT?



    • Подписаться по RSSRSS
    • Поделиться VkontakteVkontakte
    • Поделиться на FacebookFacebook
    • Твитнуть!Twitter

    Leave a Reply

    Return to Top ▲TOP ▲